4.4 Article

Academic achievement in children with chronic kidney disease: a report from the CKiD cohort

期刊

PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY
卷 34, 期 4, 页码 689-696

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00467-018-4144-7

关键词

Academic achievement; Pediatric; Chronic kidney disease

资金

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [1K23DK110443-01]
  2. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  3. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [U01-DK-66143, U01-DK-66174, U01DK-082194, U01-DK-66116]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundThere are limited data to describe academic achievement outcomes for children with mild to moderate pediatric chronic kidney disease (CKD). The objective of this study was to describe the prevalence of low academic achievement in patients with mild to moderate CKD.MethodsWechsler Individual Achievement Test, Second Edition, Abbreviated (WIAT-II-A) data were collected at entry into the Chronic Kidney Disease in Children (CKiD) study. Achievement in basic reading, spelling, mathematics, and total achievement was evaluated with a focus on the effects of comorbid CKD-related variables, neurocognitive, and school-based characteristics on academic achievement.ResultsWIAT-II-A data were available for 319 children in the CKiD cohort. Low total academic achievement was present in 34% percent of the sample. There was no significant effect of CKD-related medical variables on academic achievement. Mathematics had the lowest distribution of achievement scores. In univariate models, low achievement was significantly related to days of missed school (p=0.006) and presence of individualized education plan (p<0.0001).ConclusionsLow academic achievement was seen in over one-third of children with CKD, with the most difficulty observed in the domain of mathematics. Providers and educators should monitor for academic difficulties in this population in order to facilitate early educational assistance and promote positive educational outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据