4.5 Article

Prenatal high molecular weight phthalates and bisphenol A, and childhood respiratory and allergic outcomes

期刊

PEDIATRIC ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY
卷 30, 期 1, 页码 36-46

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pai.12992

关键词

Asthma; bisphenol A; diethylhexyl phthalate; endocrine disruptor; environmental exposure; hypersensitivity; Th1-Th2 balance

资金

  1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [R82670901, RD83171001]
  2. National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences [1RC2 ES018792, P01 ES009605, R01 ES021369, R21 ES024909, R24 ES028529]
  3. Environmental Protection Agency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background The prevalence of asthma and allergy is increasing in US children. In utero exposure to chemicals used in personal care products and plastics may contribute to increase in these diseases. Methods We quantified urinary concentrations of eight phthalate metabolites and bisphenol A in mothers twice during pregnancy in 1999-2000 in Salinas, California. We assessed probable asthma, aeroallergies, eczema, and spirometry in their children at age 7, and measured T helper 1 and T helper 2 cells in blood at ages 2, 5, and 7 (N = 392). We employed Bayesian model averaging to select confounders from additional biomarkers measured in this population and controlled for them in logistic and linear regressions. Results Monocarboxyisooctyl phthalate was associated with increased odds for probable asthma (odds ratio: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.12, 2.12), and with lower forced expiratory volume in one second (beta: -0.09 L, 95% CI: -0.15, -0.03) and forced expiratory flow from 25% to 75% of forced vital capacity (beta: -7.06 L/s, 95% CI: -11.04, -2.90). Several other associations were attenuated in final models that controlled for additional biomarkers. Conclusion Monocarboxyisooctyl phthalate was associated with lower respiratory health after controlling for related chemical exposure, which suggests that confounding by multiple chemical exposures should be considered in future research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据