4.5 Article

Tunnel driving occupational environment and hearing loss in train drivers in China

期刊

OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 76, 期 2, 页码 97-104

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2018-105269

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51405517, U1334208]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan [2015JJ3155]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M570691, 2018RS3002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective Hearing loss caused by high levels of noise is a potential occupational health disorder among train drivers around the world. This study aims to investigate the relationship between tunnel driving occupational environment and hearing loss in train drivers, to provide some insights into helping reduce hearing loss among train drivers. Methods This study analysed cross-sectional data for 1214 train drivers who work at China Railway Guangzhou Group. Health examination was taken by physicians with professional licences, and audiometric testing was performed by health technicians in a sound-isolated room. T/R is defined as the ratio of the length of the tunnels to the length of the railway along drivers' work routes. Different multivariate models and stratified models were established for sensitivity analysis. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to estimate the ORs of hearing loss associated with tunnel driving occupational environment. Results The adjusted OR for high-frequency hearing loss in association with the highest T/R levels (30%-45%) versus the lowest T/R levels (<15%) was 3.72 (95% CI 1.43 to 9.69). The corresponding OR for speech-hearing loss was 1.75 (95% CI 0.38 to 8.06). The sensitivity analysis shows our results are suitable for various alternative models. Conclusions This study found that there was a significant association between tunnel driving occupational environment and hearing loss. Train drivers who work in a higher T/R environment have worse hearing loss.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据