4.5 Article

Tocolysis: A Review of the Literature

期刊

OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY
卷 74, 期 1, 页码 50-55

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000635

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Importance Preterm delivery represents an important cause of infant morbidity and mortality. Various tocolytics have been studied with the objective of stopping preterm labor, increasing gestational age at delivery, and preventing complications related to preterm birth. Objective This review aims to summarize the major classes of tocolytics and review the evidence regarding use of each. Evidence Acquisition A PubMed search of the following terms was performed to gather relevant data: tocolytic, preterm labor, preterm delivery, PPROM, magnesium, indomethacin, nifedipine, and betamimetics. Results The benefits and risks of nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs, calcium channel blockers, magnesium, and betamimetics are reviewed. Calcium channel blockers afford superior outcomes in terms of prolonging gestation and decreasing neonatal morbidity and mortality with the fewest adverse effects. Conclusions and Relevance Tocolytics, particularly calcium channel blockers, may provide benefit to pregnant women and their infants. Their use should be tailored to the particular clinical circumstances of the patient and used in conjunction with other management strategies (e.g., administration of corticosteroids for fetal lung maturation or magnesium for neuroprotection and transfer to a tertiary medical center). Further research and professional guidelines are needed on optimal use of these agents. Target Audience Obstetricians and gynecologists, family physicians. Learning Objective s After participating in this activity, the provider should be better able to compare the major classes of tocolytics, including mechanisms of action; distinguish the role tocolytics play in preterm labor and appropriate clinical indication and course; and choose a tocolytic based on evidence regarding the potential benefits and risks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据