4.7 Review

The Fat Mass- and Obesity-Associated (FTO) Gene to Obesity: Lessons from Mouse Models

期刊

OBESITY
卷 26, 期 11, 页码 1674-1686

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/oby.22301

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MEST) [2018R1D1A1B07051274]
  2. Brain Korea 21 PLUS Project [22A20130012143]
  3. Chung Mong-Koo Foundation
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2018R1D1A1B07051274] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectiveMethodsGenetic variants at the fat mass- and obesity-associated (FTO) locus are strongly associated with obesity-related traits by regulating neighboring genes. Nevertheless, it is possible that FTO protein is directly involved in mechanisms regulating body composition and adiposity. Here, the in vivo biological functions of FTO in the risk for obesity were studied by reviewing murine models. The effects of the locus-specific manipulations of the murine Fto gene on metabolic-related phenotypes in genetically modified mouse models were reviewed and summarized into the following three categories: growth and body composition, eating behaviors, and metabolic homeostasis. ResultsConclusionsThe mouse models showed different phenotypes depending on target tissues and methods for gene manipulation. Mice harboring deletions or point mutations at the Fto locus had high metabolic rates, while FTO-overexpressing mice showed dyslipidemia. Both deletion and overexpression of the Fto gene led to abnormal eating behaviors. Intriguingly, several phenotypes were differently expressed depending on developmental timing of the genetic manipulations. For instance, a germ line deletion decreased total body fat mass, while the deletion in adult mice increased it. The results highlight that FTO is critical not only for body composition but also normal development, and its function might differ depending on the stage of development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据