4.6 Article

CYP81A P450s are involved in concomitant cross-resistance to acetolactate synthase and acetyl-CoA carboxylase herbicides in Echinochloa phyllopogon

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 221, 期 4, 页码 2112-2122

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.15552

关键词

cross-resistance; cytochrome P450; Echinochloa phyllopogon; evolution; herbicide metabolism; herbicide resistance; late watergrass; polyploid

资金

  1. National Bio-Resource Project of the MEXT, Japan
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [15H06072, 17K15234]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17K15234, 15H06072] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Californian populations of Echinochloa phyllopogon have evolved multiple-herbicide resistance (MHR), posing a threat to rice production in California. Previously, we identified two CYP81A cytochrome P450 genes whose overexpression is associated with resistance to acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibitors from two chemical groups. Resistance mechanisms to other herbicides remain unknown. We analyzed the sensitivity of an MHR line to acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACCase) inhibitors from three chemical groups, followed by an analysis of herbicide metabolism and segregation of resistance of the progenies in sensitive (S) and MHR lines. ACCase herbicide metabolizing function was investigated in the two previously identified P450s. MHR plants exhibited resistance to all the ACCase inhibitors by enhanced herbicide metabolism. Resistance to the ACCase inhibitors segregated in a 3 : 1 ratio in the F-2 generation and completely co-segregated with ALS inhibitor resistance in F-6 lines. Expression of the respective P450 genes conferred resistance to the three herbicides in rice, which is in line with the detection of hydroxylated herbicide metabolites in vivo in transformed yeast. CYP81As are super P450s that metabolize multiple herbicides from five chemical classes, and concurrent overexpression of the P450s induces metabolism-based resistance to the three ACCase inhibitors in MHR E. phyllopogon, as it does to ALS inhibitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据