4.4 Article

Therapeutic potential of luteolin in transgenic Drosophila model of Alzheimer's disease

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 692, 期 -, 页码 90-99

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.10.053

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; Neurodegeneration; Luteolin; Oxidative stress

资金

  1. Indian Council of Medical Research, ICMR, New Delhi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A transgenic fly line expressing wild type human A beta 42 were exposed to luteolin mixed in diet at final concentration of 5, 10, 15 and 20 mu M. The climbing assay, activity pattern, life span, aversive phototaxis suppression assay (APS) along with the estimation of protein carbonyl content (PCC), glutathione-S-transferase (GSTs) activity, glutathione (GSH) content, lipid peroxidation (LPO), acetylcholinesterase activity (AChE), superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, catalase (CAT) activity, caspase 3 and 9 activities in the brain of treated as well as untreated AD flies (Positive control) were studied. Histopathology of Drosophila brain sections was done by performing thioflavin-S, Bielschowsky's silver staining and toluidine blue staining. A dose-dependent increase in the life span, delay in the loss of climbing ability as well as activity was observed in AD flies exposed to luteolin compared to unexposed AD flies. A dose-dependent reduction in LPO, PCC, GST, AChE, SOD, CAT, caspase 9 and caspase 3 activity and an increase in the GSH content was also observed. Histopathological examination of fly brains using thioflavin-S and silver staining has revealed a significant dose-dependent reduction in the expression of A beta 42 peptides in AD fly groups exposed to 10, 15 and 20 mu M of luteolin. No gross morphological changes were observed in the brain sections of AD and control flies stained with toluidine blue. Molecular docking results have revealed that luteolin binds to AChE and A beta 42 at specific sites that might result in the inhibition of AChE and disaggregation/prevention of A beta 42 plaque formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据