4.8 Article

Understanding the Kinetics of Protein-Nanoparticle Corona Formation

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 10, 期 12, 页码 10842-10850

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.6b04858

关键词

protein-nanoparticle interactions; competitive protein adsorption; protein corona; FCS; DCS; SDS-PAGE; microscale thermophoresis; molecular simulation

资金

  1. EU [NMP4- SL-2011-266737]
  2. Irish Research Council [RS/2011/106]
  3. Spanish MEC [FIS2012-31025]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

When a pristine nanoparticle (NP) encounters a biological fluid, biomolecules spontaneously form adsorption layers around the NP, called protein corona. The corona composition depends on the time-dependent environmental conditions and determines the NP's fate within living organisms. Understanding how the corona evolves is fundamental in nanotoxicology as well as medical applications. However, the process of corona formation is challenging due to the large number of molecules involved and to the large span of relevant time scales ranging from 100 mu s, hard to probe in experiments, to hours, out of reach of all-atoms simulations. Here we combine experiments, simulations, and theory to study (i) the corona kinetics (over 10(-3)-10(3) s) and (ii) its final composition for silica NPs in a model plasma made of three blood proteins (human serum albumin, transferrin, and fibrinogen). When computer simulations are calibrated by experimental protein-NP binding affinities measured in single-protein solutions, the theoretical model correctly reproduces competitive protein replacement as proven by independent experiments. When we change the order of administration of the three proteins, we observe a memory effect in the final corona composition that we can explain within our model. Our combined experimental and computational approach is a step toward the development of systematic prediction and control of protein-NP corona composition based on a hierarchy of equilibrium protein binding constants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据