4.7 Article

Role of intracellular Ca2+ stores for an impairment of visual processing in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF DISEASE
卷 121, 期 -, 页码 315-326

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2018.10.015

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; Neuronal hyperactivity; Calcium stores; Impairment of visual signal processing

资金

  1. VolkswagenStiftung [90233]
  2. fortune [2200]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Besides deficits in memory and cognition, impaired visual processing is common for Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients and mouse models of AD but underlying mechanisms still remain unclear. Using in vivo Ca2+ imaging of the mouse primary visual cortex (Vi) we tested whether such impairment is caused by neuronal hyperactivity, an emerging functional hallmark of AD. Profound neuronal hyperactivity was indeed found in V1 of APP(SWE)/PS1(G384A) and even of PS1(G384A) mice, presenting neither with plaque accumulation nor with neuroinflammation. This hyperactivity was accompanied by over-responsiveness to visual stimuli and impaired visual tuning properties of individual neurons, largely caused by insufficient suppression of responses to non-preferred orientation/direction stimuli. Moreover, visual stimulation robustly suppressed the ongoing spontaneous activity in WT but not in APP(SWE)/PS1(G384A) mice. Emptying intracellular Ca2+ stores significantly reduced neuronal hyperactivity and the pathological over-responsiveness to visual stimuli, but could not rescue stimulus-induced suppression of spontaneous activity and impaired tuning properties of individual cells. Thus, our data identify the AD-mediated dysfunction of intracellular Ca2+ stores as a main cause of pathologically increased visual responsiveness in APP(SWE)/PS1(G384A) mice. At the same time, the impairment of visual tuning and the stimulus induced suppression of spontaneous activity, identified in this study, are likely caused by different mechanisms as, for example, dysfunction of local interneurons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据