4.7 Article

Discovery of potential causative mutations in human coding and noncoding genome with the interactive software BasePlayer

期刊

NATURE PROTOCOLS
卷 13, 期 11, 页码 2580-2600

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41596-018-0052-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. Biomedicum Helsinki Foundation
  2. Cancer Society of Finland
  3. Emil Aaltonen Foundation
  4. Juhani Aho Foundation for Medical Research
  5. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  6. Academy of Finland (Finnish Center of Excellence Program 2012-2017) [250345]
  7. European Research Council (ERC) [268648]
  8. European Union Framework Programme 7 Collaborative Project [258236]
  9. Nordic Information for Action eScience Center (NIASC)
  10. Nordic Center of Excellence grant - NordForsk [62721]
  11. European Research Council (ERC) [268648] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is routinely applied in life sciences and clinical practice, but interpretation of the massive quantities of genomic data produced has become a critical challenge. The genome-wide mutation analyses enabled by NGS have had a revolutionary impact in revealing the predisposing and driving DNA alterations behind a multitude of disorders. The workflow to identify causative mutations from NGS data, for example in cancer and rare diseases, commonly involves phases such as quality filtering, case-control comparison, genome annotation, and visual validation, which require multiple processing steps and usage of various tools and scripts. To this end, we have introduced an interactive and user-friendly multi-platform-compatible software, BasePlayer, which allows scientists, regardless of bioinformatics training, to carry out variant analysis in disease genetics settings. A genome-wide scan of regulatory regions for mutation clusters can be carried out with a desktop computer in -10 min with a dataset of 3 million somatic variants in 200 whole-genome-sequenced (WGS) cancers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据