4.8 Article

Synthesis of antisymmetric spin exchange interaction and chiral spin clusters in superconducting circuits

期刊

NATURE PHYSICS
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 382-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41567-018-0400-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFA0307200, 2017YFA0304202, 2016YFA0300601]
  2. National Natural Science Foundations of China [11434008, 11574380, 11725419, 11874322]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [2016XZZX002-01]
  4. key research programme of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDPB08-3]
  5. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-18-1-0141]
  6. Office of Naval Research [N00014-16-1-3054]
  7. Robert A. Welch Foundation [A-1261]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

According to quantum mechanics, chiral states cannot be non-degenerate eingenstates of a parity-conserving Hamiltonian. This is in contradiction to the existence of chiral molecules-a fact known as as the Hund paradox(1). The origin of molecular and biological chirality is conjectured to be related to parity-breaking interactions(2,)(3) or environmental decoherences(4), but a quantum superposition of two chiral molecular states with distinctive optical activities has never been observeds(5). To make progress in addressing these questions, it would be helpful to construct an artificial quantum system that breaks the parity symmetry and that can be prepared in a superposition of two chiral states. Here we report the synthesis of the parity-breaking antisymmetric spin exchange interaction in all-to-all connected superconducting circuits, which allows us to show various chiral spin dynamics in up to five-spin clusters. We also demonstrate the entanglement of up to five qubits in Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger states based on a three-spin chiral logic gate. Our results are a step towards quantum simulation of magnetism with antisymmetric spin exhange interaction and quantum computation with chiral spin states.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据