4.7 Article

Pathological priming causes developmental gene network heterochronicity in autistic subject-derived neurons

期刊

NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
卷 22, 期 2, 页码 243-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41593-018-0295-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Flow Cytometry Core Facility of the Salk Institute
  2. NGS core facility of the Salk Institute
  3. NIH-NCI [CCSG: P30 014195]
  4. Chapman Foundation
  5. Helmsley Charitable Trust
  6. James S. McDonnell Foundation
  7. G. Harold & Leila Y. Mathers Charitable Foundation
  8. JPB Foundation
  9. March of Dimes Foundation
  10. NIH [MH095741, MH090258, RO3 MH115426-01A1]
  11. Engman Foundation
  12. Paul G. Allen Family Foundation
  13. Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust [2017-PGMED001]
  14. German Research Foundation
  15. Brain & Behavior Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is thought to emerge during early cortical development. However, the exact developmental stages and associated molecular networks that prime disease propensity are elusive. To profile early neurodevelopmental alterations in ASD with macrocephaly, we monitored subject-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) throughout the recapitulation of cortical development. Our analysis revealed ASD-associated changes in the maturational sequence of early neuron development, involving temporal dysregulation of specific gene networks and morphological growth acceleration. The observed changes tracked back to a pathologically primed stage in neural stem cells (NSCs), reflected by altered chromatin accessibility. Concerted over-representation of network factors in control NSCs was sufficient to trigger ASD-like features, and circumventing the NSC stage by direct conversion of ASD iPSCs into induced neurons abolished ASD-associated phenotypes. Our findings identify heterochronic dynamics of a gene network that, while established earlier in development, contributes to subsequent neurodevelopmental aberrations in ASD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据