4.7 Article

Memory CD4+ T cells are generated in the human fetal intestine

期刊

NATURE IMMUNOLOGY
卷 20, 期 3, 页码 301-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41590-018-0294-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. Leiden University Medical Center
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO Applied Technical Sciences) [12721]
  3. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (ZonMW) [91112008]
  4. Russian Science Foundation [16-15-00149]
  5. Wellcome Trust [100326/Z/12/Z]
  6. European Commission under an MSCA-ITN award [675743/ISPIC]
  7. China Scholarship Council
  8. Russian Science Foundation [16-15-00149] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation
  9. Wellcome Trust [100326/Z/12/Z] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fetus is thought to be protected from exposure to foreign antigens, yet CD45RO(+) T cells reside in the fetal intestine. Here we combined functional assays with mass cytometry, single-cell RNA sequencing and high-throughput T cell antigen receptor (TCR) sequencing to characterize the CD4(+) T cell compartment in the human fetal intestine. We identified 22 CD4(+) T cell clusters, including naive-like, regulatory-like and memory-like subpopulations, which were confirmed and further characterized at the transcriptional level. Memory-like CD4(+) T cells had high expression of Ki-67, indicative of cell division, and CD5, a surrogate marker of TCR avidity, and produced the cytokines IFN-gamma and IL-2. Pathway analysis revealed a differentiation trajectory associated with cellular activation and proinflammatory effector functions, and TCR repertoire analysis indicated clonal expansions, distinct repertoire characteristics and interconnections between subpopulations of memory-like CD4(+) T cells. Imaging mass cytometry indicated that memory-like CD4(+) T cells colocalized with antigen-presenting cells. Collectively, these results provide evidence for the generation of memory-like CD4(+) T cells in the human fetal intestine that is consistent with exposure to foreign antigens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据