4.8 Article

N6-methyldeoxyadenine is a transgenerational epigenetic signal for mitochondrial stress adaptation

期刊

NATURE CELL BIOLOGY
卷 21, 期 3, 页码 319-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41556-018-0238-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs [P40 OD010440]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91854205, 31422033, 31471381]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of China (National Key Research and Development Program of China grant) [2017YFA0504000973]
  4. Ministry of Science and Technology of China (973 grant) [2013CB910104]
  5. Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences
  6. HHMI International Research Scholar Award [55008739]
  7. Postdoctoral Fellowship of Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

N6-methyldeoxyadenine (6mA), a major type of DNA methylation in bacteria, represents a part of restriction-modification systems to discriminate host genome from invader DNA(1). With the recent advent of more sensitive detection techniques, 6mA has also been detected in some eukaryotes(2-8). However, the physiological function of this epigenetic mark in eukaryotes remains elusive. Heritable changes in DNA 5mC methylation have been associated with transgenerational inheritance of responses to a high-fat diet(9), thus raising the exciting possibility that 6mA may also be transmitted across generations and serve as a carrier of inheritable information. Using Caenorhabditis elegans as a model, here we report that histone H3K4me3 and DNA 6mA modifications are required for the transmission of mitochondrial stress adaptations to progeny. Intriguingly, the global DNA 6mA level is significantly elevated following mitochondrial perturbation. N6-methyldeoxyadenine marks mitochondrial stress response genes and promotes their transcription to alleviate mitochondrial stress in progeny. These findings suggest that 6mA is a precisely regulated epigenetic mark that modulates stress response and signals transgenerational inheritance in C. elegans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据