4.8 Article

Targeted neurotechnology restores walking in humans with spinal cord injury

期刊

NATURE
卷 563, 期 7729, 页码 65-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0649-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. International Foundation for Research in Paraplegia (IRP)
  2. Wings for Life
  3. Wyss Center for Neuroengineering
  4. European Union's Horizon 2020 [785907]
  5. Eurostars [E10889]
  6. GTXmedical
  7. National Center of Competence in Research (NCCR) Robotics of the Swiss National Foundation
  8. Commission of Technology and Innovation Innosuisse (CTI) [25761.1]
  9. Voirol Foundation
  10. Firmenich Foundation
  11. Pictet Group Charitable Foundation
  12. Panacee Foundation
  13. riders4riders
  14. SOFMER
  15. Whitaker International Scholars Program
  16. H2020-MSCA-COFUND-2015 EPFL Fellows program [665667]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spinal cord injury leads to severe locomotor deficits or even complete leg paralysis. Here we introduce targeted spinal cord stimulation neurotechnologies that enabled voluntary control of walking in individuals who had sustained a spinal cord injury more than four years ago and presented with permanent motor deficits or complete paralysis despite extensive rehabilitation. Using an implanted pulse generator with real-time triggering capabilities, we delivered trains of spatially selective stimulation to the lumbosacral spinal cord with timing that coincided with the intended movement. Within one week, this spatiotemporal stimulation had re-established adaptive control of paralysed muscles during overground walking. Locomotor performance improved during rehabilitation. After a few months, participants regained voluntary control over previously paralysed muscles without stimulation and could walk or cycle in ecological settings during spatiotemporal stimulation. These results establish a technological framework for improving neurological recovery and supporting the activities of daily living after spinal cord injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据