4.8 Article

Measurement-based quantum control of mechanical motion

期刊

NATURE
卷 563, 期 7729, 页码 53-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0643-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (European Research Council (ERC) project Q-CEOM) [638765]
  2. FET proactive project HOT [732894]
  3. Danish Council for Independent Research
  4. Carlsberg Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Controlling a quantum system by using observations of its dynamics is complicated by the backaction of the measurement process-that is, the unavoidable quantum disturbance caused by coupling the system to a measurement apparatus. An efficient measurement is one that maximizes the amount of information gained per disturbance incurred. Real-time feedback can then be used to cancel the backaction of the measurement and to control the evolution of the quantum state. Such measurement-based quantum control has been demonstrated in the clean settings of cavity and circuit quantum electrodynamics, but its application to motional degrees of freedom has remained elusive. Here we demonstrate measurement-based quantum control of the motion of a millimetre-sized membrane resonator. An optomechanical transducer resolves the zero-point motion of the resonator in a fraction of its millisecond-scale coherence time, with an overall measurement efficiency close to unity. An electronic feedback loop converts this position record to a force that cools the resonator mode to its quantum ground state (residual thermal occupation of about 0.29). This occupation is nine decibels below the quantum-backaction limit of sideband cooling and six orders of magnitude below the equilibrium occupation of the thermal environment. We thus realize a long-standing goal in the field, adding position and momentum to the degrees of freedom that are amenable to measurement-based quantum control, with potential applications in quantum information processing and gravitational-wave detectors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据