4.7 Article

A complete FFT-based decomposition formalism for the redshift-space bispectrum

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty3249

关键词

dark matter; large-scale structure of Universe; cosmology: observations; cosmology: theory

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP15H05896]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics [DE-SC0014329]
  3. [28-1890]
  4. STFC [ST/M002853/1, ST/N000668/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0014329] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To fully extract cosmological information from non-linear galaxy distribution in redshift space, it is essential to include higher-order statistics beyond the two-point correlation function. In this paper, we propose a new decomposition formalism for computing the anisotropic bispectrum in redshift space and for measuring it from galaxy samples. Our formalism uses tri-polar spherical harmonic decomposition with zero total angular momentum to compress the 3D modes distribution in the redshift-space bispectrum. This approach preserves three fundamental properties of the Universe - statistical homogeneity, isotropy, and parity-symmetry - allowing us to efficiently separate the anisotropic signal induced by redshift-space distortions (RSDs) and the Alcock-Paczyfiski (AP) effect from the isotropic bispectrum. The relevant expansion coefficients in terms of the anisotropic signal are reduced to one multipole index L, and the L > 0 modes are induced only by the RSD or AP effects. Our formalism has two advantages: (1) we can make use of Fast Fourier Transforms to measure the bispectrum and (2) it gives a simple expression to correct for the survey geometry, i.e. the survey window function. As a demonstration, we measure the decomposed bispectrum from the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) Data Release 12, and, for the first time, present a 14 sigma detection of the anisotropic bispectrum in the L = 2 mode.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据