4.7 Article

Search for extra-tidal RR Lyrae stars in Milky Way globular clusters from Gaia DR2

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty3239

关键词

proper motion; stars: variables: RR Lyrae; globular clusters: individual: NGC 3201, NGC 5024

资金

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi
  2. BASAL Center for Astrophysics and Associated Technologies (CATA) [PFB-06]
  3. Ministry for the Economy, Development and Tourism, Programa Iniciativa Cientifica Milenio grant [IC120009]
  4. project Fondecyt [1170121]
  5. Indo-US Science and Technology Forum

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We used extra-tidal RR Lyrae stars to study the dynamics of Galactic globular clusters and know how effects like dynamical friction and tidal disruption affect these clusters. The Gaia DR2 catalogue for RR Lyrae stars (Clementini et al. 2018) is used along with the proper motions and tidal radii data for the globular clusters compiled from literature. A sample of 56 Galactic globular clusters is analysed. Out of these 56 Galactic globular clusters, only 11 have extra-tidal RR Lyrae stars. However, only two clusters, namely, NGC 3201 and NGC 5024, have enough extra-tidal RR Lyrae stars to draw interesting conclusions. NGC 3201 has 13 extra-tidal RR Lyrae stars which are asymmetrically distributed around its centre with more number of stars in its trailing zone than its leading part. We conclude that these asymmetrical tidal tails are due to the combined effect of tidal disruption and the stripped debris from the cluster. On the other hand, NGC 5024 has five extra-tidal RR Lyrae stars, four of them are concentrated in a region which is at a distance of about three times the tidal radius from its centre. These may be the stars that are being ripped apart from the cluster due to tidal disruption. The presence of these extra-tidal RR Lyrae stars in the clusters can be an indication that more cluster stars are present outside their tidal radii which may be revealed by deep wide field colour-magnitude diagrams of the clusters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据