4.6 Article

Effects of Toona sinensis Leaf Extract and Its Chemical Constituents on Xanthine Oxidase Activity and Serum Uric Acid Levels in Potassium Oxonate-Induced Hyperuricemic Rats

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 23, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules23123254

关键词

Toona sinensis; xanthine oxidase; uric acid; hyperuricemia; ultraperformance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry

资金

  1. Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine - Korean government (Ministry of Science and ICT) [K18030]
  2. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [K18030] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Toona sinensis leaf is used as a seasonal vegetable in Korea. A 70% ethanol extract of these leaves exhibited potent xanthine oxidase (XO) inhibition, with a 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 78.4 mu M. To investigate the compounds responsible for this effect, bioassay-guided purification led to the isolation of five constituents, identified as quercetin-3-O-rutinoside, quercetin-3-O--d-glucopyranoside, 1,2,3,4,6-penta-O-galloyl--d-glucopyranose (compound 3), quercetin-3-O--l-rhamnopyranoside, and kaempferol-3-O--l-rhamnopyranoside. Compound 3 showed the most potent inhibition of XO, with an IC50 of 2.8 mu M. This was similar to that of allopurinol (IC50 = 2.3 mu M), which is used clinically to treat hyperuricemia. Kinetic analyses found that compound 3 was a reversible noncompetitive XO inhibitor. In vivo, the T. sinensis leaf extract (300 mg/kg), or compound 3 (40 mg/kg), significantly decreased serum uric acid levels in rats with potassium oxonate-induced hyperuricemia. Furthermore, ultraperformance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry analysis identified a high level of compound 3 in the leaf extract. These findings suggest that T. sinensis leaves could be developed to produce nutraceutical preparations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据