4.6 Article

Lack of Antiparkinsonian Effects of Systemic Injections of the Specific T-Type Calcium Channel Blocker ML218 in MPTP-Treated Monkeys

期刊

ACS CHEMICAL NEUROSCIENCE
卷 7, 期 11, 页码 1543-1551

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.6b00186

关键词

Nonhuman primates; parkinsonism; T-type calcium channel; ML218; MPTP; pharmacokinetic; behavior

资金

  1. NIH/NINDS [R01-NS054976, P50-NS071669]
  2. Michael J. Fox foundation
  3. NIH/ORIP [R51 OD011132]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dopaminergic medications ameliorate many of the motor impairments of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, parkinsonism is often only partially reversed by these drugs, and they can have significant side effects. Therefore, a need remains for novel treatments of parkinsonism. Studies in rodents and preliminary clinical evidence have shown that T-type calcium channel (TTCC) antagonists have antiparkinsonian effects. However, most of the available studies utilized nonselective agents. We now evaluated whether systemic injections of the specific TTCC blocker ML218 have antiparkinsonian effects in MPTP-treated parkinsonian Rhesus monkeys. The animals were treated chronically with MPTP until they reached stable parkinsonism. In pharmacokinetic studies, we found that ML218 reaches a peak CSF concentration 1-2 h after s.c. administration. In electrocardiographic studies, we found no effects of ML218 on cardiac rhythmicity. As expected, systemic injections of the dopamine precursor L-DOPA dose-dependently increased the movements in our parkinsonian animals. We then tested the behavioral effects of systemic injections of ML218 (1, 10, or 30 mg/kg) or its vehicle, but did not detect specific antiparkinsonian effects. ML218 (3 or 10 mg/kg) was also not synergistic with L-DOPA. Using recordings of electrocorticogram signals (in one animal), we found that ML218 increased sleep. We conclude that ML218 does not have antiparkinsonian effects in MPTP-treated parkinsonian monkeys, due at least in part, to the agent's sedative effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据