4.6 Article

Multielemental Analysis Associated with Chemometric Techniques for Geographical Origin Discrimination of Tea Leaves (Camelia sinensis) in Guizhou Province, SW China

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 23, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules23113013

关键词

tea leaves; multielement; ICP-MS; chemometrics; geographical origin discrimination

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41463009]
  2. Innovation Group Major Research Project of Guizhou Province Education Department [KY[2016]024]
  3. Construction Project of the First-Class Subjects (Ecology) in Guizhou Province [GNYL[2017]007]
  4. Important and Special Project (Tea) of Guizhou Province Science and Technology Department
  5. Graduate Innovation Foundation Project of Guizhou Province Education [QJH-YJSCXJH-2018-049]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to construct objective and accurate geographical discriminant models for tea leaves based on multielement concentrations in combination with chemometrics tools. Forty mineral elements in 87 tea samples from three growing regions in Guizhou Province (China), namely Meitan and Fenggang (MTFG), Anshun (AS) and Leishan (LS) were analyzed. Chemometrics evaluations were conducted using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), principal component analysis (PCA), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), and orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA). The results showed that the concentrations of the 28 elements were significantly different among the three regions (p < 0.05). The correct classification rates for the 87 tea samples were 98.9% for LDA and 100% for OPLS-DA. The variable importance in the projection (VIP) values ranged between 1.01-1.73 for 11 elements (Sb, Pb, K, As, S, Bi, U, P, Ca, Na, and Cr), which can be used as important indicators for geographical origin identification of tea samples. In conclusion, multielement analysis coupled with chemometrics can be useful for geographical origin identification of tea leaves.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据