4.6 Article

Simultaneous Separation and Purification of Five Polymethoxylated Flavones from Dahongpao Tangerine (Citrus tangerina Tanaka) Using Macroporous Adsorptive Resins Combined with Prep-HPLC

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 23, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules23102660

关键词

Citrus flavonoids; PMFs; UPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS; prep-HPLC; HPD 300 resin; new method

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31772260]
  2. National Risk Assessment Program for Agricultural Products Quality and Safety [GJFP201801502]
  3. Chongqing Program for Production of Late Maturing Citrus Fruits and Plums [2018-01-4]
  4. Chongqing Sports Bureau RD project [A2017014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a preparative separation method was established to simultaneously isolate the polymethoxylated flavones (PMFs) from the peel of Dahongpao tangerine using macroporous adsorptive resins (MARs) combined with prep-HPLC. The total PMFs were enriched using MARs to remove most sugars, water-soluble pigments, and flavanones, and the eluents obtained were analyzed by ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) to determine the PMF composition. The separation and purification of PMFs were carried out by using a mass spectrometry-guided prep-HPLC with a gradient elution of acetonitrile-water (v/v), simultaneously. The purity of these PMFs was determined by UPLC, and their chemical structures were confirmed by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS-MS), ultraviolet (UV), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Using the present method, five PMFs, including 5,6,7,4'-tetramethoxyflavone (1), nobiletin (2), tangeretin (3), sinensetin (4), and 5-hydroxy-6,7,8,3',4'-pentamethoxyflavone (5), can be purified simultaneously, and the purity of the compounds obtained were 95.3%, 99.7%, 99.5%, 98.9%, and 98.1%, respectively. The method reported here is simple, rapid, and efficient, and it can be used to separate PMFs from citrus fruit peels and, potentially, other plant materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据