4.8 Article

Baseline brain structural and functional predictors of clinical outcome in the early course of schizophrenia

期刊

MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY
卷 25, 期 4, 页码 863-872

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41380-018-0269-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 MH104284-01A1]
  2. European Unit FP7 program [IMAGEMEND 602450]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation [P300PB_171584]
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [P300PB_171584] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although schizophrenia is considered a brain disorder, the role of brain organization for symptomatic improvement remains inadequately defined. We investigated the relationship between baseline brain morphology, resting-state network connectivity and clinical response after 24-weeks of antipsychotic treatment in patients with schizophrenia (n = 95) using integrated multivariate analyses. There was no significant association between clinical response and measures of cortical thickness (r = 0.37, p = 0.98) and subcortical volume (r = 0.56, p = 0.15). By contrast, we identified a strong mode of covariation linking functional network connectivity to clinical response (r = 0.70; p = 0.04), and particularly to improvement in positive (weight = 0.62) and anxious/depressive symptoms (weight = 0.49). Higher internal cohesiveness of the default mode network was the single most important positive predictor. Key negative predictors involved the functional cohesiveness of central executive subnetworks anchored in the frontoparietal cortices and subcortical regions (including the thalamus and striatum) and the inter-network integration between the default mode and sensorimotor networks. The present findings establish links between clinical response and the functional organization of brain networks involved both in perception and in spontaneous and goal-directed cognition, thereby advancing our understanding of the pathophysiology of schizophrenia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据