4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

MapMan4: A Refined Protein Classification and Annotation Framework Applicable to Multi-Omics Data Analysis

期刊

MOLECULAR PLANT
卷 12, 期 6, 页码 879-892

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.molp.2019.01.003

关键词

Plant genomes; Functional annotation; MapMan; Mercator; Transcriptomes

资金

  1. Tromso Research Foundation, Norway [16-TF-KK]
  2. German Ministry for Education and Research, Germany [0315961, 031A053A, 031B0200D, 031B0199E, 031A536, 031B0070]
  3. Ministry of Innovation, Science and Research of North-Rhine Westphalia, Germany within North-Rhine Westphalia Strategieprojekt BioEconomy Science Center [313/323-400-00213]
  4. EU [679303, 731013, 727934]
  5. Max Planck Society, Germany

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genome sequences from over 200 plant species have already been published, with this number expected to increase rapidly due to advances in sequencing technologies. Once a new genome has been assembled and the genes identified, the functional annotation of their putative translational products, proteins, using ontologies is of key importance as it places the sequencing data in a biological context. Furthermore, to keep pace with rapid production of genome sequences, this functional annotation process must be fully automated. Here we present a redesigned and significantly enhanced MapMan4 framework, together with a revised version of the associated online Mercator annotation tool. Compared with the original MapMan, the new ontology has been expanded almost threefold and enforces stricter assignment rules. This framework was then incorporated into Mercator4, which has been upgraded to reflect current knowledge across the land plant group, providing protein annotations for all embryophytes with a comparably high quality. The annotation process has been optimized to allow a plant genome to be annotated in a matter of minutes. The output results continue to be compatible with the established MapMan desktop application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据