4.5 Article

Substrate-Induced Motion between TM4 and TM7 of the Glutamate Transporter EAAT1 Revealed by Paired Cysteine Mutagenesis

期刊

MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY
卷 95, 期 1, 页码 33-42

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/mol.118.113183

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31570716, U1603281]
  2. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT_16R37]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To maintain efficient synaptic communication, glutamate transporters reuptake glutamate from the synaptic cleft and prevent glutamate concentrations from reaching neurotoxic levels. The number of amino acid residues of the transmembrane (TM) domain 4b-4c loop of mammalian excitatory amino acid transporters (EAATs) is 50 amino acids more than that of the prokaryotic homolog. To investigate the spatial proximity and functional significance of residues in glutamate transporters, cysteine pairs were introduced at positions A243 of the TM4b-4c loop and T396 or A414 of TM7, respectively. The transport activity of double mutants A243C/T396C and A243C/A414C was inhibited by Cu(II) (1,10-phenanthroline)(3) [copper phenanthroline (CuPh)] and cadmium ions, but the uptake activity of corresponding single mutants remained unchanged. Treatment with dithiothreitol after CuPh restored much of the transport activity. The inhibitory effects of CuPh and cadmium could only be detected when cysteine pairs are in the same polypeptide. Therefore, we suggest that the formation of these disulfide bonds occurs intramolecularly. Glutamate, potassium, and DL-threo-beta-benzyloxyaspartate facilitated crosslinking in the A243C/T396C transporter and this suggests that the TM4b-4c loop and beta-bridge region in TM7 were drawn into close proximity to each other in the inward- and outward-facing conformation of EAAT1. Thus, these data provide evidence that substrate-induced structural rearrangements occur between the TM4b-4c loop and TM7 during the transport cycle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据