4.5 Article

Noncoding rare variants of TBX6 in congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract

期刊

MOLECULAR GENETICS AND GENOMICS
卷 294, 期 2, 页码 493-500

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00438-018-1522-6

关键词

CAKUT; Gene dosage; Noncoding variant; TBX6

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31771396, 31625015, 31521003, 81670609]
  2. Shanghai Medical Center of Key Programs for Female Reproductive Diseases [2017ZZ01016]
  3. Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project [2017SHZDZX01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) are a wide range of congenital structural renal defects. CAKUT is the leading cause of chronic renal failure and end-stage renal disease in children. Studies in humans and animal models have confirmed the large genetic contribution to CAKUT. The previous evidence suggested that human TBX6 coding mutations might cause CAKUT via gene-dosage insufficiency. However, the potential involvement of TBX6 noncoding mutations in CAKUT remains to be elucidated. Here, we described DNA sequencing and copy-number analysis of TBX6 in 269 Chinese subjects with CAKUT. Interestingly, we identified two heterozygous noncoding variants of TBX6 in sporadic subjects with CAKUT: one is c.769-7delT, from a subject with duplex renal and collecting system, and the other is a 3 untranslated region (3-UTR) variant (c.1392C>T) from a subject with unilateral renal hypoplasia. These two TBX6 noncoding variants are novel and extremely rare, respectively, in human populations archived in the ExAC database. The mini-gene splicing assay showed that the TBX6 c.769-7delT variant significantly reduced the splicing efficiency of TBX6 intron 5 when compared to the wild-type control. In this work, we identified a novel splicing variant of TBX6 in human CAKUT. Our experimental observations suggested that the TBX6 noncoding variant can affect gene expression and may potentially be involved in human CAKUT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据