4.8 Article

SLiM 3: Forward Genetic Simulations Beyond the Wright-Fisher Model

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 36, 期 3, 页码 632-637

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msy228

关键词

eco-evolutionary dynamics; whole-population modeling; tree sequence recording; spatial population dynamics; landscape modeling; genealogy simulation

资金

  1. College of Agriculture and Life Sciences at Cornell University, New Zealand's Predator Free 2050 program [SS/05/01]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01GM127418]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the desire to model population genetic processes under increasingly realistic scenarios, forward genetic simulations have become a critical part of the toolbox of modern evolutionary biology. The SLiM forward genetic simulation framework is one of the most powerful and widely used tools in this area. However, its foundation in the Wright-Fisher model has been found to pose an obstacle to implementing many types of models; it is difficult to adapt the Wright-Fisher model, with its many assumptions, to modeling ecologically realistic scenarios such as explicit space, overlapping generations, individual variation in reproduction, density-dependent population regulation, individual variation in dispersal or migration, local extinction and recolonization, mating between subpopulations, age structure, fitness-based survival and hard selection, emergent sex ratios, and so forth. In response to this need, we here introduce SLiM 3, which contains two key advancements aimed at abolishing these limitations. First, the new non-Wright-Fisher or nonWF model type provides a much more flexible foundation that allows the easy implementation of all of the above scenarios and many more. Second, SLiM 3 adds support for continuous space, including spatial interactions and spatial maps of environmental variables. We provide a conceptual overview of these new features, and present several example models to illustrate their use.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据