4.5 Article

Effect of extracellular polymeric substances on the mechanical properties of Rhodococcus

期刊

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-BIOMEMBRANES
卷 1848, 期 2, 页码 518-526

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2014.11.007

关键词

AFM; Bacterial cell probe; Extracellular polymeric substances; Force spectroscopy; Polyelectrolytes; Rhodococcus

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [GR/S74267/01, EP/I012060/1]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [GR/S72467/01, EP/I012060/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. EPSRC [EP/I012060/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mechanical properties of Rhodococcus RC291 were measured using force spectroscopy equipped with a bacterial cell probe. Rhodococcal cells in the late growth stage of development were found to have greater adhesion to a silicon oxide surface than those in the early growth stage. This is because there are more extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) that contain nonspecific binding sites available on the cells of late growth stage. It is found that EPS in the late exponential phase are less densely bound but consist of chains able to extend further into their local environment while the denser EPS at the late stationary phase act more to sheath the cell. Contraction and extension of the EPS could change the density of the binding sites, and therefore affect the magnitude of the adhesion force between the EPS and the silicon oxide surface. By treating rhodococcal EPS as a surface-grafted polyelectrolyte layer and using scaling theory, the interaction between EPS and a solid substrate was modelled for the cell approaching the surface which revealed that EPS possess a large capacity to store charge. Changing the pH of the surrounding medium acts to change the conformation of EPS chains. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据