4.2 Article

Prognostic significance of CD163 expression and its correlation with cyclooxygenase-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor expression in cutaneous melanoma

期刊

MELANOMA RESEARCH
卷 29, 期 5, 页码 501-509

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000549

关键词

CD163; cyclooxygenase-2; macrophages; melanoma; vascular endothelial growth factor

资金

  1. Asan Life Science Institute [2017-753]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In several cancers, tumor progression is associated with the infiltration of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). The aim was to evaluate the prognostic significance of expression of CD163 and CD68 (TAMs' markers) and their correlation with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression in cutaneous melanoma. Diagnostic tissues from 102 patients of cutaneous melanoma were evaluated by immunohistochemistry for their CD68, CD163, VEGF, and COX-2 expression. Correlations between the proteins were then investigated. Clinicopathological features, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival were analyzed in terms of the expression of these proteins. CD163, but not CD68, expression correlated with VEGF and COX-2 expression. High expression for CD163 was associated with a deeper Breslow thickness and an advanced stage of the disease. High expression of CD163 was associated with lower OS. No significant differences were noted in CD68 expression between the clinicopathological variables and the OS. COX-2 expression was associated with a deeper Breslow thickness and a higher frequency of lymph node involvement. Multivariate analysis revealed that CD163 expression and COX-2 expression were independent prognostic markers of lower survival outcomes. Our data confirmed that CD163 expression provides independent prognostic information in cutaneous melanoma. The correlation of CD163 with VEGF and COX-2 expression suggests various tumor-promoting actions of CD163-positive TAMs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据