4.5 Article

Correlation of tumor uptake on breast-specific gamma imaging and fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT with molecular subtypes of breast cancer

期刊

MEDICINE
卷 97, 期 43, 页码 -

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012840

关键词

technetium-99m sesta-methoxyisobutylisonitrile; breast cancer; breast-specific gamma imaging; breast-specific gamma imaging; fluorodeoxyglucose

资金

  1. Hanyang University [HY-2017-N]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mechanisms of technetium-99m sesta-methoxyisobutylisonitrile (sestamibi) and F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake by tumor are different. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between the tumor uptake of these 2 tracers in invasive ductal carcinoma and to examine thecorrelation of uptake of each tracer with prognostic factors and tumor molecular subtypes. A total of 96 patients with invasive ductal carcinoma who underwent preoperative breast-specific gamma imaging and FDG positron-emission tomography/computed tomography were retrospectively enrolled. Tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) of sestamibi and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of FDG were correlated with each other. Each of them was then compared with prognostic factors and molecular subtypes. In all tumors, there was a moderate positive correlation between TBR and SUVmax (r = 0.520, P < .001). Both TBR and SUVmax were significantly correlated with tumor size, incidence of axillary lymph node metastasis, histologic grade, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor status, and Ki-67. There is a moderate degree of association between TBR of sestamibi and SUVmax of FDG in the invasive breast cancer. Two imaging indexes showed the similar tendency related with prognostic factors and molecular subtypes. While both TBR and SUVmax were significantly different between luminal A and nonluminal A tumors, neither of them had high enough sensitivity or specificity to obviate pathologic and molecular diagnosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据