4.8 Article

Selective Improvement of NO2 Gas Sensing Behavior in SnO2 Nanowires by Ion-Beam Irradiation

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 8, 期 21, 页码 13646-13658

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b01619

关键词

nanowires; gas sensor; ion-beam irradiation; SnO2; NO2

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean government (MEST) [NRF-2013R1A2A2A01068438]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2013R1A2A2A01068438] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We irradiated SnO2 nanowires with He ions (45 MeV) with different ion fluences. Structure and morphology of the SnO2 nanowires did not undergo noticeable changes upon ion-beam irradiation. Chemical so, equilibrium in SnO2/gas systems was calculated from thermodynamic principles, which were used to study the sensing selectivity of the tested gases, demonstrating the selective sensitivity of the SnO2 surface to NO2 gas. Being different from other gases, including H-2, ethanol, acetone, SO2, and NH3, the sensor response to NO2 gas significantly increases as the ion fluence Acetone increases, showing a maximum under an ion fluence of 1 X 10(16) ions/cm(2). Photoluminescence analysis shows that the relative intensity of the peak at 2.1 eV to the peak at 2.5 eV increases upon ion-beam irradiation, suggesting that structural defects and/or tin interstitials have been generated. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy indicated that the ionic ratio of Sn2+/Sn4+ increases by the ion-beam irradiation, supporting the formation of surface Sn interstitials. Using thermodynamic calculations, we explained the observed selective sensing behavior. A molecular level model was also established for the adsorption of NO2 on ion-irradiated SnO2 (110) surfaces. We propose that the adsorption of NO2-related species is considerably enhanced by the generation of surface defects that are comprised of Sn interstitials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据