4.3 Article

Magnetically targetable microcapsules display subtle changes in permeability and drug release in response to a biologically compatible low frequency alternating magnetic field

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.10.031

关键词

Doxycycline; Microcapsules; Alternating magnetic field; Intracellular; Targeted delivery

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High frequency alternating magnetic fields (AMF) have been widely used as a non-invasive method to induce local hyperthermia for antitumor treatment and to efficiently trigger drug release from various carriers. However, few studies have exploited the potential of targeted drug delivery to healthy cells or tissue and the use of low frequency AMF (LF-AMF) for intracellular triggered release. To achieve this goal, doxycycline was delivered with the layer-by-layer (LbL) assembled magnetic microcapsules, and AMF with low frequency (50 Hz) was applied. The low frequency AMF had little effect on morphology of microcapsules, which upon exposure for 360 min caused no significant damage and had the advantage of minimizing heating effects. Nonetheless, microcapsule permeability increased as a function of exposure time when assessed using FITC-dextran (70 kDa) with the number of permeable microcapsules increased from 13.5% (20 min) to 52.8% (360 min). Increased permeability also enhanced in vitro doxycycline release in genetically engineered myoblast cells where EGFP expression is regulated by the tetracycline system, while targeted EGFP expression was observed by magnetically navigating the microcapsules to a site of interest. Upon LF-AMF exposure of 30 min, no cytotoxicity was observed, but intracellular doxycycline release was promoted and enhanced EGFP expression as demonstrated by EGFP fluorescence intensity measurement. This study reveals the possibility of targeted drug delivery and using LF-AMF as a non-cytotoxic intracellular trigger of drug release from microcapsules without alteration in cell viability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据