4.8 Article

One-Step Synthesis of Cagelike Hollow Silica Spheres with Large Through-Holes for Macromolecule Delivery

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 8, 期 48, 页码 33316-33325

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b11639

关键词

hollow; large through-holes; silica; lysozyme; oil-in-water miniemulsion

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51673041, 51322307, 51273218, 51133001, 21374018]
  2. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission
  3. Shanghai Education Development Foundation [14SG04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A facile, one-step method to prepare cagelike hollow silica nanospheres with large through-holes (HSNLs) using a lysozyme-assisted O/W miniemulsion technique is presented. The tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) xylene mixture forms oil droplets which are stabilized by the cationic surfactant cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), cosurfactant hexadecane (HD), and protein lysozyme. HSNLs (with diameter of 300-460 nm) with large through-holes (10-30 nm) were obtained directly after ultrasonic treatment and aging. Lysozyme can not only stabilize the oil/water interface, assist the hydrolysis of TEOS, and interact with silica particles to assemble into silica-lysozyme clusters but also contribute to the formation of through-holes due to its hydrophilicity variation at different pH conditions. A possible new mechanism called the interface desorption method is proposed to explain the formation of the through-holes. To confirm the effectiveness of large through-holes in delivering large molecules, bovine serum albumin (BSA, 21 x 4 x 14 nm(3)) was chosen as a model guest molecule; HSNLs showed much higher loading capacity compared with common hollow mesoporous silica nanospheres (HMSNs). The release of BSA can be well controlled by wrapping HSNLs with a heat-sensitive phase change material (1-tetradecanol). Cell toxicity was also conducted with a Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay to roughly evaluate the feasibility of HSNLs in biomedical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据