4.8 Article

Oil-Infused Superhydrophobic Silicone Material for Low Ice Adhesion with Long-Term Infusion Stability

期刊

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
卷 8, 期 46, 页码 32050-32059

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b11184

关键词

superhydrophobic; oil-infusion; ice adhesion; anti-icing; microtexturing

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [IIP 1343450]
  2. School of Engineering Foundation
  3. NSF, Division of Materials Research, Polymers Program [DMR-1206259]
  4. Division Of Materials Research
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1608022] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new approach for anti-icing materials was created to combat the effects of ice accretion and adhesion. The concept combines the strengths of individual characteristics for low ice adhesion based on elasticity, superhydrophobicity, and slippery liquid infused porous surfaces (SLIPS) for an optimal combination of high water repellency and ice-phobicity. This was achieved by replicating microtextures from a laser-irradiated aluminum substrate to an oil-infused polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) elastomer, the result;-4 of which is a flexible, superhydrophobic, and lubricated material. This design provides multiple strategies of icing protection through high water repellency to retard ice accretion and with elasticity and oil infusion for low ice adhesion in a single material. Studies showed that an infusion of silicone oils with viscosity at 100 cSt and below 8 wt % in PDMS solution is sufficient to reduce the ice shear strength to an average of 38 kPa while maintaining contact angles and roll-off angles of above 150 and below 10, respectively. This ice adhesion value is a similar to 95% reduction from a bare aluminum surface and similar to 30% reduction from a microtextured, superhydrophobic PDMS material without oil infusion. In addition, three-month aging studies showed that the wetting and ice-adhesion performance of this material did not significantly degrade.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据