4.8 Article

Tuning the Catalytic Activity of a Metal-Organic Framework Derived Copper and Nitrogen Co-Doped Carbon Composite for Oxygen Reduction Reaction

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 8, 期 40, 页码 26769-26774

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b08320

关键词

electrocatalyst; metal-organic framework; oxygen reduction reaction; fuel cell

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Science and Engineering [DE-SC0008055]
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) [DMR-1437263]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0008055] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An efficient non-noble metal catalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) is of great importance for the fabrication of cost-effective fuel cells. Nitrogen-doped carbons with various transition metal co-dopants have emerged as attractive candidates to replace the expensive platinum catalysts. Here we report the preparation of various copper- and nitrogen doped carbon materials as highly efficient ORR catalysts by pyrolyzing porphyrin based metal organic frameworks and investigate the effects of air impurities during the thermal carbonization process. Our results indicate that the introduction of air impurities can significantly improve ORR activity in nitrogen-doped carbon and the addition of copper co-dopant further enhances the ORR activity to exceed that of platinum. Systematic structural characterization and electrochemical studies demonstrate that the air-impurity-treated samples show considerably higher surface area and electron transfer numbers, suggesting that the partial etching of the carbon by air leads to increased porosity and accessibility to highly active ORR sites. Our study represents the first example of using air or oxygen impurities to tailor the ORR. activity of metal and nitrogen co-doped carbon materials and open up a new avenue to engineer the catalytic activity of these materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据