4.8 Article

Novel Blue Organic Dye for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Achieving High Efficiency in Cobalt-Based Electrolytes and by Co-Sensitization

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 8, 期 48, 页码 32797-32804

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b09671

关键词

blue color; organic dyes; co-sensitization; cobalt electrolyte; dye-sensitized solar cells

资金

  1. Swedish Energy Agency
  2. Swedish Research Council (VR)
  3. STandUP for Energy program
  4. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  5. Stiftelsen Olle Engkvist Byggmatare
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation [200021_157135/1]
  7. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200021_157135] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Blue and green dyes as well as NIR-absorbing dyes have attracted great interest because of their excellent ability of absorbing the incident photons in the red and near-infrared range region. A novel blue D-pi-A dye (Dyenamo Blue), based on the diketopyrrolopyrrole (DPP)-core, has been designed and synthesized. Assembled with the cobalt bipyridine-based electrolytes, the device with Dyenamo Blue achieved a satisfying efficiency of 7.3% under one sun (AM1.5 G). The co-sensitization strategy was further applied on this blue organic dye together with a red D-pi-A dye (D35). The successful co-sensitization outperformed a panchromatic light absorption and improved the photocurrent density; this in addition to the open-circuit potential result in an efficiency of 8.7%. The extended absorption of the sensitization and the slower recombination reaction between the blue dye and TiO2 surface inhibited by the additional red sensitizer could be the two main reasons for the higher performance. In conclusion, from the results, the highly efficient cobalt-based DSSCs could be achieved with the co-sensitization between red and blue D-pi-A organic dyes with a proper design, which showed us the possibility of applying this strategy for future high-performance solar cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据