4.4 Article

Eave ribbons treated with the spatial repellent, transfluthrin, can effectively protect against indoor-biting and outdoor-biting malaria mosquitoes

期刊

MALARIA JOURNAL
卷 17, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12936-018-2520-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust Masters Fellowship in Public Health
  2. Association of Physicians of Great Britain and Ireland [106356/Z/14/Z]
  3. Wellcome Trust Intermediate Research Fellowship [WT102350/Z/13/Z]
  4. Wellcome Trust [106356/Z/14/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundLong-lasting insecticide-treated nets and indoor residual spraying protect against indoor-biting and indoor-resting mosquitoes but are largely ineffective for early-biting and outdoor-biting malaria vectors. Complementary tools are, therefore, needed to accelerate control efforts. This paper describes simple hessian ribbons treated with spatial repellents and wrapped around eaves of houses to prevent outdoor-biting and indoor-biting mosquitoes over long periods of time.MethodsThe eave ribbons are 15cm-wide triple-layered hessian fabrics, in lengths starting 1m. They can be fitted onto houses using nails, adhesives or Velcro, without completely closing eave-spaces. In 75 experimental nights, untreated ribbons and ribbons treated with 0.02%, 0.2%, 1.5% or 5% transfluthrin emulsion (spatial repellent) were evaluated against blank controls using two experimental huts inside a 202m(2) semi-field chamber where 500 laboratory-reared Anopheles arabiensis were released nightly. Two volunteers sat outdoors (one/hut) and collected mosquitoes attempting to bite them from 6p.m. to 10p.m. (outdoor-biting), then went indoors and slept under bed nets, beside which CDC-light traps collected mosquitoes from 10 p.m. to 6.30 a.m. (indoor-biting). To assess survival, 200 caged mosquitoes were suspended near the huts nightly and monitored for 24h thereafter. Additionally, field tests were done in experimental huts in a rural Tanzanian village to evaluate treated ribbons (1.5% transfluthrin). Here, indoor-biting was assessed using window traps and Prokopack((R)) aspirators, and outdoor-biting assessed using volunteer-occupied double-net traps.ResultsIndoor-biting and outdoor-biting decreased>99% in huts fitted with eave ribbons having0.2% transfluthrin. Even 0.02% transfluthrin-treated ribbons provided 79% protection indoors and 60% outdoors. Untreated ribbons however reduced indoor-biting by only 27% and increased outdoor-biting by 18%, though these were non-significant (P>0.05). Of all caged mosquitoes exposed near treated huts, 99.5% died within 24h. In field tests, the ribbons provided 96% protection indoors and 84% outdoors against An. arabiensis, plus 42% protection indoors and 40% outdoors against Anopheles funestus. Current prototypes cost similar to 7USD/hut, are made of widely-available hessian and require no specialized expertise.ConclusionTransfluthrin-treated eave ribbons significantly prevented outdoor-biting and indoor-biting malaria vectors and could potentially complement current tools. The technique is simple, low-cost, highly-scalable and easy-to-use; making it suitable even for poorly-constructed houses and low-income groups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据