4.5 Article

Mapping connectomes with diffusion MRI: deterministic or probabilistic tractography?

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
卷 81, 期 2, 页码 1368-1384

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27471

关键词

connectome; diffusion MRI; ground truth; network; phantom; tractography

资金

  1. 16 NIH Institutes and Centers [1U54MH091657]
  2. McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience at Washington University
  3. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [1136649]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Human connectomics necessitates high-throughput, whole-brain reconstruction of multiple white matter fiber bundles. Scaling up tractography to meet these high-throughput demands yields new fiber tracking challenges, such as minimizing spurious connections and controlling for gyral biases. The aim of this study is to determine which of the two broadest classes of tractography algorithms-deterministic or probabilistic-is most suited to mapping connectomes. Methods: This study develops numerical connectome phantoms that feature realistic network topologies and that are matched to the fiber complexity of in vivo diffusion MRI (dMRI) data. The phantoms are utilized to evaluate the performance of tensor-based and multi-fiber implementations of deterministic and probabilistic tractography. Results: For connectome phantoms that are representative of the fiber complexity of in vivo dMRI, multi-fiber deterministic tractography yields the most accurate connectome reconstructions (F-measure = 0.35). Probabilistic algorithms are hampered by an abundance of false-positive connections, leading to lower specificity (F = 0.19). While omitting connections with the fewest number of streamlines (thresholding) improves the performance of probabilistic algorithms (F = 0.38), multi-fiber deterministic tractography remains optimal when it benefits from thresholding (F = 0.42). Conclusions: Multi-fiber deterministic tractography is well suited to connectome mapping, while connectome thresholding is essential when using probabilistic algorithms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据