4.7 Article

Elastic-Plastic Transformation of Polyelectrolyte Complex Hydrogels from Chitosan and Sodium Hyaluronate

期刊

MACROMOLECULES
卷 51, 期 21, 页码 8887-8898

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.8b01658

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [17H06144]
  2. China Scholarship Council [201406060092]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018ZD14]
  4. National Science Foundation [EFMA-1830957, DMR-I121107]
  5. National Institutes of Health [P01-HL108808, R01-HL136961, 5UH3HL123645]
  6. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
  7. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL136961, UH3HL123645, P01HL108808] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrogels formed by polyelectrolyte complexation (PEC) of oppositely charged biopolymers, free of any chemical additives, are promising biomaterials. In this work, the mechanical behavior of hydrogels consisting of positively charged chitosan and negatively charged sodium hyaluronate (HA) at balanced charge composition is investigated. These hydrogels exhibit strong tensile strain and strain rate dependence. They are elastic-like, independent of the strain rate at small strain, but exhibit plastic-like behavior above the yield point by showing a monotonous decrease of the stress. The cyclic tensile test demonstrates that these hydrogels exhibit small and quickly recoverable hysteresis in the elastic-like region but large and partially recoverable hysteresis above the yield point. The stress relaxation experiment shows a plateau in the reduced stress followed by an abrupt fracture, and the time to failure decreases exponentially with increasing applied step strain. Such elastic-to-plastic-like transformation of the biopolymer PEC gels is quite different from the behaviors of PEC hydrogels formed by oppositely charged vinyl-type synthetic polyelectrolytes due to the difference in flexibility, charge density, and ionic bond strength of these polymers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据