4.8 Article

Penetratin Peptide-Functionalized Gold Nanostars: Enhanced BBB Permeability and NIR Photothermal Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease Using Ultralow Irradiance

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 8, 期 30, 页码 19291-19302

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b05089

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; amyloid-beta; gold nanostars; blood-brain barrier; penetratin peptide

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21171070, 21371075]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2014A030311025]
  3. Planned Item of Science and Technology of Guangdong Province [2016A020217011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The structural changes of amyloid-beta (A beta) from nontoxic monomers into neurotoxic aggregates are implicated with pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Over the past decades, weak disaggregation ability and low permeability to the blood brain barrier (BBB) may be the main obstacles for major A beta aggregation blockers. Here, we synthesized penetratin (Pen) peptide loaded poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)-stabilized gold nanostars (AuNS) modified with ruthenium complex (Ru@Pen@PEG-AuNS), and Ru(II) complex as luminescent probes for tracking drug delivery. We revealed that Ru@Pen@PEG-AuNS could obviously inhibit the formation of A beta fibrils as well as dissociate preformed fibrous A beta under the irradiation of near-infrared (NIR) due to the NIR absorption characteristic of AuNS. More importantly, this novel design could be applied in medicine as an appropriate nanovehicle, being highly biocompatible and hemocompatible. In addition, Ru@Pen@PEG-AuNS had excellent neuroprotective effect on the A beta-induced cellular toxicity by applying NIR irradiation. Meanwhile, Pen peptide could effectively improve the delivery of nanoparticles to the brain in vitro and in vivo, which overcame the major limitation of A beta aggregation blockers. These consequences illustrated that the enhanced BBB permeability and efficient photothermolysis of Ru@Pen@PEG-AuNS are promising agents in AD therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据