4.6 Article

Thermoresponsive Coatings on Hollow Particles with Mesoporous Shells Serve as Stimuli-Responsive Gates to Species Encapsulation and Release

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 34, 期 48, 页码 14608-14616

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b02714

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1236089]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanoscale capsule-type particles with stimuli-respondent transport of chemical species into and out of the capsule are of significant technological interest. We describe the facile synthesis, properties, and applications of a temperature-responsive silica-poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) composite consisting of hollow silica particles with ordered mesoporous shells and a complete PNIPAM coating layer. These composites start with highly monodisperse, hollow mesoporous silica particles fabricated with precision using a template-driven approach. The particles possess a high specific surface area (1771 m(2)/g) and large interior voids that are accessible to the exterior environment through pore channels of the silica shell. An exterior PNIPAM coating provides thermoresponsiveness to the composite, acting as a gate to regulate the uptake and release of functional molecules. Uptake and release of a model compound (rhodamine B) occurs at temperatures below the lower critical solution temperature (LCST) of 32 degrees C, while the dehydrated hydrophobic polymer layer collapses over the particle at temperatures above the LCST, leading to a shutoff of uptake and release. These transitions are also manifest at an oil-water interface, where the polymer-coated hollow particles stabilize oil-in-water emulsions at temperatures below the LCST and destabilize the emulsions at temperatures above the LCST. Cryogenic scanning electron microscopy indicates patchlike particle structures at the oil-water interface of the stabilized emulsions. The silica-PNIPAM composite therefore couples advantages from both the hollow mesoporous silica structure and the thermoresponsive polymer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据