4.6 Article

Co-deposition Kinetics of Polydopamine/Polyethyleneimine Coatings: Effects of Solution Composition and Substrate Surface

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 34, 期 44, 页码 13123-13131

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b02454

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21534009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polydopamine-based chemistry has been employed for various surface modifications attributed to the advantages of universality, versatility, and simplicity. Co-deposition of polydopamine (PDA) with polyethyleneimine (PEI) has then been proposed to realize one-step fabrication of functional coatings with improved morphology uniformity, surface hydrophilicity, and chemical stability. Herein, we report the co-deposition kinetics related to the solution composition with different dopamine/PEI ratios, PEI molecular weights, dopamine/PEI concentrations, and the substrate surface with varying chemistry and wettability. The addition of PEI to dopamine solution suppresses the precipitation of PDA aggregates, resulting in an expanded time window of steady co-deposition compared with that of PDA deposition. Low-molecular-weight PEI at low concentration accelerates the co-deposition process, while high-molecular-weight PEI and high concentration of either PEI or dopamine/PEI are detrimental to the co-deposition efficiency. Meanwhile, the surface morphology and chemical composition of the co-deposition coatings can be regulated by the solution conditions during co-deposition. Moreover, obvious deviations in the co-deposition rate and the amount of substrates bearing various functional groups, such as alkyl, phenyl, hydroxyl, and carboxyl, are revealed, which are quite different from PDA deposition. The initial adsorption rates further reflect the change in interactions between the aggregates and these substrates caused by PEI, which follows the sequence of carboxyl > hydroxyl > alkyl > phenyl. These results provide deep insights into the PDA/PEI co-deposition process on various substrates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据