4.7 Article

A feature selection approach for hyperspectral image based on modified ant lion optimizer

期刊

KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
卷 168, 期 -, 页码 39-48

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2018.12.031

关键词

Hyperspectral image; Feature selection; Wavelet support vector machine; Ant lion optimizer; Levy flight

资金

  1. National Key Research & Development Program of China [2017YFC1404700, 2017YFC150 2406-03]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1711266]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [CUG2017JM06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Feature selection is one of the most important issues in hyperspectral image (HSI) classification to achieve high correlation between the adjacent bands. The main concern is selecting fewer bands with the highest accuracy as possible. Generally, it is a combinatorial optimization problem and cannot be fully solved by swarm intelligence algorithms. Ant lion optimizer (ALO) is a newly proposed swarm intelligence algorithm that mimics the swarming behaviour of antlions. In addition, wavelet support vector machine (WSVM) is able to enhance the stability of the classification result, and Levy flight helps swarm intelligence algorithms jump out of the local optimum. Therefore, in this paper, a novel feature selection method based on a modified ALO (MALO) and WSVM is proposed to reduce the dimensionality of HSIs. The proposed method is compared with some state-of-the-art algorithms on some HSI datasets. Moreover, a new evaluating criteria is formulated to estimate the performance of feature selection, and the classification accuracy and selected number of bands are balanced as much as possible. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms other approaches, finds the optimal solution with a reasonable convergence orientation, and its classification accuracy is satisfied with fewer bands, it is robust, adaptive and might be applied for practical work of feature selection. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据