4.5 Article

Seasonal sex steroids indicate reproductive costs associated with snake fungal disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY
卷 307, 期 2, 页码 104-110

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jzo.12628

关键词

testosterone; estradiol; Ophidiomyces ophiodiicola; sublethal effects; real-time PCR; conservation physiology; snake fungal disease; reproduction

类别

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [IOS-1145625]
  2. Stockton University Research and Professional Development Grant
  3. Brown Center for Faculty Innovation and Excellence at Stetson University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Emergent diseases may result in population declines by inducing mortality directly or through sublethal effects on host reproduction. Snake fungal disease (SFD) is an emerging threat to biodiversity, but the sublethal impacts of disease on host fitness are poorly characterized. The cryptic nature of most snakes makes direct assessment of the fitness consequences of SFD challenging. In such contexts, measurement of sex steroids that correlate positively with seasonal reproductive investment may be useful in inferring the scope of disease impacts. To test the hypothesis that SFD is associated with reproductive suppression, we measured testosterone and estradiol in free-ranging pygmy rattlesnakes with varying clinical signs of SFD. We also used real-time PCR to validate the relationship between clinical signs and Ophidiomyces ophiodiicola (Oo) DNA presence on the skin. Infected males had lower testosterone compared to uninfected males during summer spermatogenesis and the fall breeding season. Infected females were less likely to have elevated estradiol compared to uninfected females during spring vitellogenesis. Approximately 85% of individuals with clinical signs were positive for Oo DNA. Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that coping with SFD comes at a cost to the reproductive success of afflicted individuals, and that seasonal sex steroids may be valuable early indicators of sublethal effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据