4.2 Article

Influence of miR-520e-mediated MAPK signalling pathway on HBV replication and regulation of hepatocellular carcinoma cells via targeting EphA2

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIRAL HEPATITIS
卷 26, 期 4, 页码 496-505

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jvh.13048

关键词

EPH receptor A2; hepatitis B virus; hepatocellular carcinoma; miR-520e

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31500148]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2012HM082, ZR2013HQ062]
  3. Program of Science and Technology Development Plan of Tai'an city

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We determined the role of miR-520e in the replication of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and the growth of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells. MiR-520e and EPH receptor A2 (EphA2) in HBV-positive HCC tissues and cells were detected, and we studied the impact of miR-520e and the EphA2 receptor in cellular and murine HBV replication models. We find that MiR-520e was upregulated and EphA2 was downregulated in HBV-positive HCC tissues and cells. MiR-520e was decreased in Huh7-X and HepG2-X cells in which HBx was stably expressed, but was dose-dependently elevated after interfering with HBx. Additionally, miR-520e mimic and si-EphA2 groups were reduced in association with increases in HBV DNA content, HBsAg and HBeAg levels, cell proliferation and were enhanced in the expressions of EphA2, p-p38MAPK/p38MAPK, phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (p-ERK1/2)/ERK1/2 and cell apoptosis. Furthermore, si-EphA2 reversed the promotion effect of miR-520e inhibitor on HBV replication and tumour cell growth. Upregulating miR-520e in rAAV8-1.3HBV-infected mouse resulted in reduced EphA2 in liver tissues and HBV DNA content in serum. We find that MiR-520e was decreased in HBV-positive HCC, while overexpression of miR-520e blocked p38MAPK and ERK1/2 signalling pathways by an inhibitory effect on EphA2 and ultimately reduced HBV replication and inhibited tumour cell growth. These data indicate a role for miR-520e in the regulation of HBV replication.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据