4.7 Article

Numerical performance analysis of a counter-flow double-pipe heat exchanger with using nanofluid and both sides partly filled with porous media

期刊

JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY
卷 135, 期 2, 页码 1595-1610

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-018-7829-z

关键词

Double-pipe heat exchanger; Porous; Partial; Nanofluid; Two-phase; Performance evaluation criterion (PEC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Simultaneous application of nanofluid and porous media in a counter-flow double-pipe heat exchanger is studied in order to enhance its heat transfer with minimum power increase. Both channels of the heat exchanger are partially/completely filled with porous media, and different configurations of porous layers with various Darcy values are analyzed in different Reynolds numbers. Nanofluid flow is simulated using two-phase mixture model and flow through porous media obeys from Darcy-Brinkman-Forchheimer rule. Results are presented in terms of the performance evaluation criterion. First, the inner and outer pipes were filled with porous media having the same Darcy number. Depending on Darcy value, two optimal regions exist: 1partial filling of only the inner pipe and 2complete filling of the both pipes. Next, different combinations of Darcy number of the inner and outer pipes have been investigated for various filling portions and Reynolds numbers. Depending on Re and Da numbers, three different optimum situations exist: 1partial filling of the inner pipe; 2partial filling of the outer pipe; and 3complete filling of the both pipes. For instance at Re-i=500 and Da(o)=10(-4), when a very low (Da(i)=10(-4)), moderate (Da(i)=10(-2)) or high (Da(i)=10(-1)) permeable porous medium is used in the inner pipe, the optimal situations are, respectively, the first, third and second situations. Based on the working conditions of the heat exchanger, proper porous layer thickness and Darcy configuration have to be selected to meet the maximum performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据