4.7 Article

Nanostructured mixed Ni/Pt hydroxides electrodes for BIA-amperometry determination of hydralazine

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtice.2018.08.033

关键词

Ni/Pt hydroxide nanoparticles; Hydralazine; Modified FTO electrodes; Batch injection analysis

资金

  1. Brazilian agency Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico - CNPq [141480/2014-9, 141853/2015-8, 306504-2011-1]
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - CAPES [33002010017PO - Capes/Proex]
  3. Fundacao de Amparo A Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo - FAPESP [2017/13137-5]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A fluorine doped tin oxide (FTO) coated glass modified with mixed nickel/platinum hydroxide nanoparticles (alpha-Ni0.98Pt0.02(OH)(2)) was utilized as BIA amperometric sensor for fast determination of hydralazine in pharmaceutical formulations. The new electrode material was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermal analysis (TG-DTA), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and voltammetry, exhibiting high conductivity and enhanced activity compared to the FTO electrode without modification. The alpha-Ni0.98Pt0.02(OH)(2) electrode associated with batch injection analysis (BIA) showed good amperometric response to hydralazine, attaining detection and quantification limits of 5.93 x 10(-6) and 2.0 x 10(-5) mol/L, respectively, besides elevated analytical frequency (240 samples/h). The amount of hydralazine in real pharmaceutical samples were analyzed by BIA/amperometry and UV-Vis spectrophotometry, the method recommended by the United States Pharmacopeia, giving comparable results. In fact, both methods presented very good concordance (difference of 0.8%) indicating that the BIA method associated with the features of alpha-Ni0.98Pt0.02(OH)(2) electrode is thus well-suited for electroanalytical purposes, and can be employed for determination of hydralazine in pharmaceuticals. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据