4.7 Article

Application of palladium-modified zeolite for prolonging post-harvest shelf life of banana

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
卷 99, 期 7, 页码 3467-3474

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.9565

关键词

ethylene; banana; Pd-modified zeolite; post-harvest; firmness; ripening

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan [NSC97-2815-C-005-025-B, NSC97-2221-E-005-096, NSC 102-2221-E-005-001-MY3]
  2. Innovation and Development Center of Sustainable Agriculture from The Featured Areas Research Center Program within the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUNDThe marketability of banana is limited by the rapid rate of ripening. However, the traditional post-harvest technologies may not be desirable. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of a reusable material for the food preservation industry. RESULTSThe nanocomposite-based palladium (Pd)-modified zeolite (Pd/zeolite) was prepared by impregnating Pd into zeolite. Pd/zeolite had a Brunauer-Emmett-Teller dinitrogen specific surface area of 475 m(2) g(-1) with crystal structure similar to Y-zeolite. Transmission electron microscopy images showed the dispersion of Pd particles over the multi-pore zeolite support. Pd/zeolite uniquely acted as an adsorbent and a catalyst and was able to remove ethylene even after reaching breakthrough point. To prove Pd/zeolite is reusable, a 99 0.8% ethylene removal efficiency still remained even after five consecutive cycles with repeated use of Pd/zeolite. The presence of Pd/zeolite significantly decreased the ethylene concentration during 18 days of storage at 20 +/- 2 degrees C. CONCLUSIONSPd/zeolite could delay the ripening of banana and improve its firmness and the peel color significantly. Findings indicated that the as-prepared Pd/zeolite is an effective adsorbent/catalyst with high potential for practical application in ethylene removal, especially for the post-harvest period. (c) 2019 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据