4.7 Article

Study of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons generated from fatty acids by a model system

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
卷 99, 期 7, 页码 3548-3554

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.9575

关键词

PAHs; fatty acid; model system; heating; higher temperature

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [31501585]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUNDThe characteristics of carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) produced from various fatty acids, as important components of fats and oils, at high temperature are still little known. The reason is because the existing data are from experiments conducted in complex food systems. In this study, 12 PAHs produced from nine fatty acids, representing saturated fatty acids (SFAs), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), were investigated in a model system heated at 98, 165 and 240 degrees C. RESULTSSFAs can with difficulty be pyrolyzed to generate PAHs at 98 degrees C, but small amounts of PAHs were determined in MUFAs (44.97 mu g kg(-1)) and PUFAs (177.73 mu g kg(-1)). When the temperature reached 165 degrees C, there were totals of 27.59, 142.8 and 449.68 mu g kg(-1) PAHs assayed in SFAs, MUFAs and PUFAs, respectively. The amounts of PAHs generated from SFAs, MUFAs and PUFAs at 240 degrees C were higher when compared with those of the 165 degrees C group (P<0.05). With an increase of heating temperature, the proportion of PAHs with four to five rings increased. Under the same heating conditions, the concentration of PAHs in fatty acids increased with an increase in the number of double bonds. CONCLUSIONSMore PAHs, especially carcinogenic ones with four to five rings, will be produced in fatty acids heated at higher temperature. The content of PAHs generated from fatty acids increased with an increase in the number of double bonds. This study will increase the understanding of the production characteristics of PAHs from various fatty acids under heating condition. (c) 2019 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据