4.3 Article

Relationships between boring sponge assemblages and the availability of dead coral substrate on Mexican Pacific coral reefs

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0025315418000899

关键词

Bioerosion; coral mortality; coral reefs; El Nino; Porifera

资金

  1. CONACYT-SEP [CB-2012-01-177537]
  2. Research Council of Scientific Research of the Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolas de Hidalgo

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Boring sponges are an important component of bioeroder assemblages in tropical coral reefs. They are considered as a potential threat for coral reef health, and the increase of dead corals is expected to promote their abundance. The relationship between the availability of dead coral substrata and the development of boring sponge assemblages was evaluated during El Nino 2015-16 at five reefs from Zihuatanejo, Guerrero, Mexico. Environment and substrate quality were assessed. Overall, environment conditions remained normal in relation to previous studies in the area. Only water temperature showed unusually high records at all sites and coincided with bleaching and mortality of corals, possibly caused by the effects of the El Nino event. Abundance of boring sponges in dead corals and coral rubble was lower than during previous studies. Although sponge abundance was not directly related to cover of both dead corals and coral rubble, cover of dead corals showed a high correlation with the variation in the structure of sponge assemblages across sites. Cliona vermifera dominated sponge assemblages at all sites, and its abundance was high under conditions of high cover of live corals and low cover of bleached corals. Since overall sponge abundance responded in a similar way, these results suggest that boring sponge assemblages dominated by C. vermifera are enhanced by conditions favourable for corals. Our results imply that El Nino events in the Mexican Pacific are not likely to cause immediate population outbreaks of boring sponges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据